Staged death of Arkady Babchenko inspires questions about alleged hit-list

Ukraine's chairperson has robustly defended the decision to fake the deaths among a journalist, as questions persist over the necessity of the stunt and an alleged “hit-list” of future potential victims.

Last week Ukrainian authorities announced the murder of Russian journalist Arkady Babchenko at his apartment in Kiev, simply for Babchenko to show up alive the next day at a press conference about his “murder”.

” If we want to protect the freedom of the press, if we want to protect journalists, this is the kind of technique we need to use, ” said chairwoman Petro Poroshenko, speaking to Spanish newspaper El Pais.” Would you have preferred it if the Russian secret services had murdered that journalist? ”

Babchenko had received numerous threats on his life, inspiring him to flee Russia for Ukraine a year ago. However, neither Poroshenko nor any other Ukrainian official has given any clear indication of how the fake demise helped save his life or others, especially given that the supposed shooter was already believed to be cooperating with the SBU, Ukraine's security service.

Authorities have suggested that the subterfuge was necessary to reveal a further list of victims that the Moscow-based ” mastermind” wanted dead. There has been no hard evidence published yet to connect the plot to Moscow, or to explain why the fake death was necessary to obtain the names.

Borys Herman, who is currently in jail on distrust of hiring the hitman to kill Babchenko, has also claimed he was working for the Ukrainian security services all along, adding further confusion to the case.

Poroshenko promised that the SBU would depict its cards soon: ” They arrested the guilty party and, in the very near future, they will show where the money and orders came from, and the listings of journalists to kill. ”

On Tuesday, the Ukrainian website strana.ua published what it said was the listing of potential targets, which included 47 names of journalists and activists. It was not clear whether the listing was genuine, but some of those named corroborated they had been told by the SBU that they were potential future victims.

” I can confirm that I was at the SBU and they informed me about this, after I signed a non-disclosure agreement, ” Olesya Yakhno, whose name appears on the list, said in a Facebook post. She indicated a potential series of reaches could be aimed at destabilising Ukraine ahead of general elections due next year.

” The year before the 2019 elections is a very risky and difficult period for Ukraine when it comes to attempts at destabilisation and creating chaos, ” she said.” Not against a particular politician, but against Ukraine as a nation. ”

Others were more sceptical. Ekaterina Sergatskova, a Kiev-based journalist on the listing, said she had been told to report to the SBU, but when she did so on Tuesday was given a document that said she was a witness in the Babchenko case.

” What could I maybe know about the example? During questioning I understood there is nothing: not why I am supposedly a witness , not why I was ordered to report to the SBU. There were no questions about the actual case and no proof to show that I was in any peril, ” she said during a Facebook post.

Radio Free Europe said it speaks in three of the people on the listing on condition of anonymity. All three said they had been told to sign a non-disclosure agreement by the SBU and offered protection, which they repudiated. One said they had also been questioned about their political views.

Read more: www.theguardian.com