From the #DeleteUber campaign to fake news, the industry observed itself in the crosshairs this year and it was a long time arriving, experts say

When Jonathan Taplin's book Move Fast and Break Things, which dealt with the fretting rise of big tech, was first published in the UK in April 2017, his publishers removed its subtitle because they didn't think it was supported by evidence:” How Facebook, Google and Amazon cornered culture and undermined republic .”

When the paperback edition comes out early next year, that subtitle will be restored.

” It's been a sea change in simply six months ,” Taplin told.” Before that, people were kind of asleep .”

In the last year, barely a day has gone by without a scandal placing technology companies in the spotlight, whether for sexual harassment, livestreamed slaying, Russian influence operations or terrorist propaganda.

Tech's annus horribilis started with calls to #DeleteUber, but the way things are going it will end with calls to delete the entire internet.

” 2017 will no doubt been a year when tech has found there is a target painted on its back ,” told Om Malik, a venture capitalist.” The big companies have been so preoccupied with growth that there's been a lack of social responsibility. Now the chickens are coming home to roost .”

The surprise election of Donald Trump acted as a catalyst for scrutiny of the platforms that shape so much of our online experience. Even so, it's taken many months for the enormity of their role to sink in.

Perhaps the biggest wake-up bellow has been the showdown in Washington. Congress summoned represented by Facebook, Twitter and Google to testify over their role in a multi-pronged Russian operation to influence the 2016 presidential election. All three companies admitted that Russian entities bought ads on their sites in an attempt to skewed the vote.

In Facebook's case, fake accounts pushed divisive messages in swing states; Google found similar activity across its paid search tool and YouTube; and on Twitter, armies of bots and fake users promoted fake news narratives that were favourable to Donald Trump. Similar patterns were identified around the Brexit vote.

” The election shows the stakes involved here ,” told Noam Cohen, author of The Know-It-Alls: The Rise of Silicon Valley as a Political Powerhouse and Social Wrecking Ball.” In the past, to be a critic of Silicon Valley was to say the smartphone is stimulating us dumb. Now it's incompatible with republic .”

It's not been the only example to new technologies companies monetising and distributing unpalatable content and acting surprised when it's uncovered.

In March, the Times of London revealed that YouTube had paid, via an advertising revenue share, Islamic extremists to peddle hate speech, leading to a boycott from many major advertisers. A second boycott started this month after brands discovered that their ads were appearing alongside content being are used by paedophiles.

In May, the Guardian's investigation into Facebook's content moderation policies revealed that the social network flouted Holocaust denial statutes except where it dreaded being sued. Four months later, Pro Publica discovered that Facebook's ad tools could be used to target” Jew haters “.

Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, subsequently said she was ” disgusted” and” disappointed that our systems let this “.

Representatives
Representatives of Facebook, Twitter and Google testify before lawmakers in October. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/ Getty Images

Taplin detects the technology companies' standard reply of” Oops, we'll fix this” frustrating and disingenuous.

” Come on! What were you thinking ?” he told.” If I can target women who drink bourbon in Tennessee who like trucks, then of course I could use it for dark intents .”

The deepening pockets and growing influence of companies like Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple has raised concerns that they have become Goliaths, threatening the innovation Silicon Valley was once known for.

You merely have to look at Snap to see what happens when you nip at the heels of a tech titan like Facebook: first, it makes an offer to buy you- a strategy that worked with Instagram and WhatsApp- and, if that fails, it eliminates you.

In Snap's case, this mean watching Facebook clone all of Snapchat's features- awkwardly at first, but relentlessly until Snapchat's potential slice of the advertising marketplace shriveled to a sliver.

“[ The Snap CEO] Evan Spiegel is having his hat handed to him ,” Taplin said , noting how Snap's stock had plummeted since the company ran public in March.

As power consolidates into the hands of a few, the best a startup can hope for is to be bought by one of the tech giants. This, in turn, leads to further consolidation.

So the five largest tech companies- desperate to avoid the kind of antitrust regulation that disrupted IBM and Microsoft's dominance- are inundating Washington with lobbyists, to the point where they now outspend Wall Street two to one.

” Regulation is going ,” said Malik.” We have got to prepare for that. Everybody has figured out that we are the enemy number one now because we are rich and all the legislators reek blood .”

It doesn't help that there's a rising number of former Silicon Valley technologists and business leaders who have morphed into tech objectors, complaining about the addictive properties of the platforms and call for people- especially children- to unplug.

In November, Facebook's founding chairperson, Sean Parker, said the social network knew from the outset it was creating something addictive, something that exploited” a vulnerability in human psychology”- a damning critique somewhat undermined by the fact that it was being delivered from the top of an enormous money piling generated by that exploitation.

The vast wealth on display in Silicon Valley- in the private passenger buses, sprawling campuses and luxury condos- does little to endear the companies and their employees to the rest of the world. Like it or not, tech workers have become the glistening beacons of prosperity and elitism, shining a little bit too brightly at a time of increasing income inequality.

The fact that $700 internet-connected juicers can raise $120 m in funding before folding adds to the sense that Silicon Valley has lost its grip on reality.

” Silicon Valley at its core wants to solve problems. I just think we've lost touch with the types of problems that actual people need solving ,” said Ankur Jain, who set up Kairos Society to encourage more entrepreneurs to solve problems where everyday people are being financially squeezed, such as housing, student loans and chore retraining in the face of automation.

” People are so removed from the rest of the ecosystem in Silicon Valley that these problems feel more like charity issues rather than issues that affect the vast majority of the population ,” Jain said.

For Malik, many of the problems stem from the fact that Silicon Valley companies have remained” wilfully ignorant” of the fact that” at the end of every data point there is a human being “.

All their own problems to have arisen over the past year are especially jarring given the tech companies' continued insistence that they are doing good for the world.

” It's a form of gaslighting to have these companies doing so many harmful things telling you how great they are and how much they are helping you. It's another form of abuse ,” Cohen told.

Malik concurred.” Silicon Valley is very good at utilizing terms like empathy and social responsibility as marketing buzzwords, but the objective is words that we need to internalise as an industry and reveal through our actions by constructing the right things ,” he told.” Otherwise it's all bullshit .”

Read more: www.theguardian.com