In his first State of the Union address, President Donald Trump nodded to the catastrophic blizzards and wildfires that killed more than 300 Americans and caused a record $306 billion in injuries.
Yet he made no mention of the planetary warming — 2017 was the second-hottest year on record — that worsened the disasters, instead bolstering his administration’s aggressive fossil fuel pushing.
“We endured floods and fires and storms, ” Trump said. “But through it all, we have considered the beauty of America’s soul, and the steel in America’s spine.”
The White House constructed slashing environmental regulations a cornerstone of its agenda over the past year, running as far as to purge government websites of climate data and remove issues like sea-level rise from the administration’s listing of security threats. The deregulatory assault came as Trump aggressively aimed to increase fossil fuel production and use.
The speech set a glossy finish on the president’s so-called “energy dominance” agenda, as the United States is poised this year to outshine Saudi Arabia and Russia as the largest oil producer.
“We have ended the area of combating American energy, ” he said. “We are now very proudly an exporter of energy to the world”
In reality, the U.S. remains a steady importer of crude oil, and likely won’t become a net exporter of energy until the 2020 s, according to a forecast this month by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Exportations, driven by the boom in shale oil brought on by the rise of hydraulic fracturing, surged under former President Barack Obama.
“The thing about the U.S. energy painting is as of late it’s very much a success narrative, but that’s a story that plainly began well before Mr. Trump became chairperson, ” Ethan Zindler, a Washington , D.C.-based analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said before the speech. “But it also continued last year.”
Trump also boasted during the address that coal made a comeback under his government.
“We have ended the war on American Energy and we have ended the war on beautiful, clean coal, ” he said.
But the revival fell flat compared to his promises. Coal production and exports increased slightly, but coal-fired plant closures continued apace.
Trump are systematically portrayed himself as the coal industry’s savior, but the federal agency that controls energy infrastructure repudiated the administration’s merely plan to subsidize coal plants earlier this month. The Washington Post this month debunked the president’s asserts about helping coal miners and stoking demand for ga, and devoted the president three and four “Pinocchios” for his statements on those topics, indicating that they were highly inaccurate.
“Clean coal, ” meanwhile, remains an oxymoronic myth as experimental projects to capture and contain carbon dioxide emissions at coal-burning plants continue to fail or prove too expensive.
Along with boosting America’s production of fossil fuel, Trump vowed — as he has before — to rebuild America’s disintegrating roads, airports and bridges. But he offered few detailed information about how he plans to pay for it.
“I am asking both parties to come together to give us the safe, fast, dependable, and modern infrastructure our economy needs and our people deserve, ” Trump said.
Trump is expected to proposed infrastructure plans that could make it easier to obtain building permits. The fossil fuel industry — especially pipeline builders — could gain the most from the health risks change, but renewable energy producers could also benefit.
“That may not please environmentalists, but it’s important not to necessarily conflate the clean-energy industry with the environmental community, ” Zindler said before the speech.
“It’s so backwards, ” John O’Grady, chairwoman of American Federation of Government Employees Council 238, which represents more than 8,000 people who work at the Environmental Protection Agency, told HuffPost ahead of the speech. “They’re trying to use 1970 as the starting point and work their way backward.”
A leaked White House document, which Politico and Axios obtained last week, suggested the government would look to sell off, trade or transfer federal assets, including land, to help pay for infrastructure projects. It also outlined the administration’s plans to use mineral and energy revenues to pay for such improvements. Paul Teller, a special assistant to the chairman for legislative affairs, told Politico the memoranda does not reflect the final proposal.
A spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke also rejected reports that public land is on the table. “The Secretary’s position is unchanged, ” she told the Missoulian. Both Zinke and Trump are systematically said they resist sold at or transferring control of federal lands.
Adding to environmentalists’ frets, The Washington Post reported Friday on a second leaked draft document suggesting the White House aims to scale back environmental requirements to simplify and fast-track its infrastructure attempts. The scheme would require government agencies to adhere to strict environmental review deadlines and limit certain agencies’ abilities to prevent projects from moving forward.
In a bellow with reporters ahead of Trump’s speech, representatives from several environmental groups slammed the White House proposal.
“It’s a swindle that will gut or significantly change at least 10 bedrock environmental laws to make it easier for corporations to bypass critical protections for air, water and wildlife, ” said Christy Goldfuss, senior vice president for energy and environment policy at the Center for American Progress.
