WASHINGTON( Reuters) – An organization established for U.S. President Donald Trump’s transition to the White House a year ago said here on Saturday that the special counsel investigating allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 election had obtained tens of thousands of emails unlawfully.
Kory Langhofer, counsel to the transition squad known as Trump for America, Inc ., wrote a letter to congressional committees to say Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team had improperly received the emails from the General Service Administration, a government agency.
Career staff member at relevant agencies “unlawfully made TFA’s private materials, including privileged communications, to the Special Counsel’s Office, ” according to the letter, a copy of which was ensure by Reuters. It said the materials included “tens of thousands of emails.”
Trump’s transition team use facilities of the GSA, which helps manage the U.S. government bureaucracy, in the period between the Republican’s November presidential election victory and his inauguration in January.
The Trump team’s accusation adds to the growing friction between the president’s supporters and Mueller’s office as it analyse whether Russia interfered in the election and if Trump or anyone on his team colluded with Moscow.
Asked for comment, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said: “We continue to cooperate fully with the special counsel and expect this process to wrap up soon.”
The GSA and officials at the special counsel’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Norm Eisen, who served on former President Barack Obama’s transition team, answered on Twitter to the letter, saying “there is NO expectation of privacy in your transition emails.”
Democrats say there is a wide-ranging effort by the president’s allies on Capitol hill and in some media outlets to discredit Mueller’s investigation.
Trump himself has loudly declared Mueller’s effort a waste of time. “There is absolutely no collusion. That has been proven, ” Trump told reporters on Friday. Russia denies interfering in the election.
On Friday, Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House of Representative Intelligence Committee, said he anxieties the committee’s Republican majority intends to close its investigation of the topic prematurely. Some Republican have asserted that Mueller is biased against Trump and should be fired.
The letter was sent to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, and the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
It asked for Congress to act immediately “to protect future presidential transitions from having their private records embezzled by government agencies, particularly in the context of sensitive investigations intersecting with political motives.”
The letter said Mueller’s office procured the emails despite the fact that it was aware the GSA did not own or control the records. It said the special counsel’s office has “extensively use the materials in question, including sections that are susceptible to claims of privilege” without apprise the Trump for America team.
On the transition team were a number of aides who were later caught up in Mueller’s investigation, such as former national security consultant Michael Flynn who pleaded guilty this month to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia.
Langhofer, the Trump transition team lawyer, wrote in his letter that the GSA’s transfer of materials was discovered on Dec. 12 and 13.
The FBI had requested information materials from GSA staff last Aug. 23, asking questions copies of the emails, laptops, cell phones and other materials associated with nine members of the Trump transition team response for national security and policy matters, the letter said.
On Aug. 30, the FBI requested the materials of four additional senior members of the Trump transition team, it said.
Langhofer was contended that while such transition teams are involved in executive functions, they are considered private , nonprofit organizations whose records are private and not subject to presidential records laws.
Read more: www.huffingtonpost.com
