Few people had heard of the cellist Sergei Roldugin, but since his name proved up in the Panama Papers as the likely bag man for Putin, his name’s becoming a household word.”>
MOSCOW Before the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists released the now famous Panama Papers, the enormous leak of offshore fiscal records, almost nobody in Russia remembered that Vladimir Putins closest friend from the 1970 s was a St. Petersburg musician named Sergei Roldugin. Even fewer could imagine that the cellist with an old- fashioned haircut lived a secret life offstage, allegedly plotting huge swindles and moving more than$ 2 billion through a network of offshore bank accounts and companies.
Many wondered if Roldugin could have done all that for his best friend, were curious to know why Putin preferred the musician, and not a business tycoon , not an FSB agent or a judo sparring partner to be his finance man. So the mystery life of the soloist from the Mariinskiy Theater orchestra pit was quickly and widely discussed in Russian business and civil society circles when the news broke.
I am so surprised, I have no wordsI always thought that somebody like the billionaire Timchenko or Putins sons-in-law would be his purse men, investigative reporter Pavel Kanygin told The Daily Beast. But maybe all of them were in the cross-hairs of taxation police. And nobody expected that the purse man would be the cellist.
The head of civil society organization Russia Behind The Bars, Olga Romanova, admitted she had never heard the name Roldugin before the Panama Papers. This is an astonishing journalistic investigation, Romanova told The Daily Beast. I am very surprised to learn about Roldugin and now I am waiting to hear about Putins personal masseur, also supposedly a regent, like Roldugin. I believe there are several men who Putin is using in his shadowy fiscal life.
Russian experts agreed that the musician Roldugin was a perfect nominee for shadowy swindles. If Roldugin was hiding the money for Putin, as his personal finance man , nobody was supposed to know about thatmoney, as we all know, likes stillnes, Moscow financial expert Aleksei Kozlov told The Daily Beast. Investigating the transfers to one Mossack Fonseca, the company at the heart of the scandal, Kozlov said, All the deals are fake, their goal is to receive offshore fund from big corporations and the receiver is a man close to the president, a politically exposed person, Kozlov said.
Several Russian public figure assumed that the only politician Roldugin could be saving the money for was president Putin and that the musician did not inform the offshore company that he was a politically exposed person, or PEP, in the lingo of corruption investigations.( PEPs are people entrusted with prominent public functions that could be abused for fund laundering, bribery and the like .)
It would be difficult to prove that Roldugin was maintaining fund for the president, but the legalization of moneythe laundering of illicit fundswould be possible to analyse and penalise for, as that was corruption, Kozlov told The Daily Beast.
The vice-president of Transparency International, Yelena Panfilova, was impressed to learn about Roldugin: That was a very-very smart choice of a character, any transactions could be done using Roldugin, while it would be very difficult to catch and prosecute him for transgressing both anti-money-laundering and anti-corruption laws, Panfilova said. He is an ideal instrument.
While Russian officials mentioned in the Panama Papers denied their sins and threatened to sue the authors, the talk of the town in Moscow was about the punishment for Russian politicians, their friends and family members maintaining fund on offshore accounts.
Where did Roldugin get the money from? Maxim Mironov, a prof at the IE Business School in Madrid, has analyzed Raldugins transactions. In the blog published on Echo of Moscow website, Mironov said that he was absolutely certain that the money was bribes given to the president.
But if the money collected overseas for a decade came from various bribes to Putin, who would penalise his friend? That was a difficult question even for Transparency International. The Financial Action Task Force( FATF) delegates such issues to national jurisdictions and Russia, in spite of multiple promises for years, never created the record of PEPs.
Indeed, dedicated what we have now detected, why would it?
Read more: www.thedailybeast.com