The US chairpeople links to Russia reflect the depth of the political crisis. This is a scandal of the entire American right

Whos the rogue here? Naturally our rage focuses on Donald Trump, a pantomime baddie draw, as he would put it, from central casting. But behind him stand many others, and its about time they shared in the opprobrium.

Start with the unfolding scandal over Trumpworlds links with Vladimir Putins Russia, and the increasingly close parallel with the Watergate affair that toppled Richard Nixon. Both episodes, then and now, began with an election-year break-in at Democratic party headquarters. In 1972, that involved burglars with torches. In 2016, it was hackers and passwords. But in each case, real and virtual, the apparent objective was the same: the acquisition of injury political intelligence. In 1972, the culprits were taking their orders from the American president. In 2016, at least according to 17 US intelligence agencies, the orders came from the president of Russia.

Watergate spawned the now-cliched axiom that its never the crime, its always the cover-up. In the present example, its correct that had Trumps associates told the truth instantly about their contacts with Moscow, they would now be tackling controversy rather than scandal. If us attorney general Jeff Sessions had admitted that he had fulfilled Russias ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, twice last year, hed have inspired created eyebrows rather than calls for his head.

And by lying under oath, insisting hed had no such meetings, Sessions has induced his position as head of the US criminal justice system morally untenable. But even if he survives, Conferences has raised suspicions about what, exactly, he was so keen to cover up.

The same runs for the meeting Trumps son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and humiliation former national security adviser Michael Flynn are now known to have had with Kislyak after the election and before the inauguration. That encounter, too, was never disclosed and would have remained secret had journalists not discovered it. Indeed, with a camera permanently stationed in the vestibule at Trump Tower, Kislyak must have been spirited in via a back entrance. If it was a perfectly legitimate diplomatic meeting, why the secrecy?

Its becoming a pattern. Senior Trump officials from the president downwards deny all contact with the Russians only to be contradicted by the facts. They then have to explain why they lied, behaviour unacceptable even to those who might otherwise be relaxed about the negotiations with Moscow. As Watergate proved, a first lie can spawn hundreds of others and its those that get you.

But there is one big, dispiriting discrepancies between the scandal unfold now and the one that unseated Nixon. Four decades ago, Nixon was forced to resign because Republicans in Congress deserted him. They put their partisan allegiance aside in order to act against a chairman whom they insured as endangering the republic. This time, the picture is very different.

Sure, Republican senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham vow to hold Trump to account. But the rest of them are profiles in moral weakness, prepared to turn two blind eyes to the actions of the president simply because he wears the right party colourings. So Devin Nunes, chair of the House intelligence committee, which should be investigating all this, says theres nothing there . His colleague Jason Chaffetz, who chairs the House oversight committee, declined to look into the Flynn affair because its taking care of itself. Oversight, it seems, is precisely the right word. But please dont gives the impression that Chaffetz is lethargic in his supervisory responsibilities. On the contrary, theres one scandal hes very keen to investigate even now: Hillary Clintons employ of a private email server.

Remember that? Lock her up, the Republicans chanted throughout 2016, expressed his belief that Clinton had put sensitive information at risk. The email affair predominated coverage and fatally damaged her campaign. Well, it turns out that as governor of Indiana, vice-president Mike Pence also utilized a private email account to conduct state business, including sensitive security matters and counter-terrorism, and that account was promptly hacked. Pence maintained strangely quiet about that.

Read more: www.theguardian.com